Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 645/2019

Case between V S Lalan vs Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy regarding amendment of written statement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the defendant to amend their written statement in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff argues against the amendment, stating that it is improper and untimely.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to amend the written statement was dismissed by the court. The court found no merit in permitting the amendment after the trial had commenced.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition was found to be belated and not necessary for proper adjudication of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.500/-.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V S Lalan (58 years) Veliyil House, Chalikkavattam, Vennala P O, Kochi- 682028

Defendants

Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy (Age not specified years) Erukad House, Chalikkavattam, Vennala, Edappally South Village Baiju S S (56 years) Souparnika House, D2 Galaxy Castle, Vennala P O, Chalikkavattam, in Edappally South Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition for amendment of the written statement
Evidence:
this court is satisfied that there is no merits in the present petition and also the petition is highly belated

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases