Case Summary
V. K. SREERAM MADHAVAN is the petitioner seeking to contest the case on merits against multiple respondents including POYIL ABDULLA and others. The case involves a request for an opportunity to present arguments on the merits of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed RPIA on a payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondent
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petitioner is granted a chance to contest the case on merits, provided that costs of Rs. 1,000/- are paid to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated legitimate grounds to request an opportunity to contest the case.
The petitioner demonstrated legitimate grounds to request an opportunity to contest the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated legitimate grounds to request an opportunity to contest the case.
The petitioner demonstrated legitimate grounds to request an opportunity to contest the case.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner can be given a chance to contest the case on merits as per the reason stated in the affidavit and counter.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, RPIA is allowed on a payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondent/petitioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V. K. SREERAM MADHAVAN
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POYIL ABDULLA
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POYIL ASHRAF
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POYIL ASLAM
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POYIL ARSHAD
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL RAFEEQ
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Arunkuar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini K Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
RPIA is allowed on a payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondent/petitioner.
Evidence:
However, on a payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- to the respondent/petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. K. SREERAM MADHAVAN vs POYIL ABDULLA et al regarding contesting a case on merits.
Case Code Year
Case between V. K. SREERAM MADHAVAN vs POYIL ABDULLA et al regarding contesting a case on merits.