Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 130/2020

Case between V. J Vincent et al vs V. J Raphel et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-05
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves V. J Vincent and related plaintiffs against V. J Raphel and other defendants regarding a suit. The court dismissed the case due to the absence of necessary parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit against the first defendant as they are a necessary party to the suit. The suit could not be maintained and was ultimately dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed against D1. As D1 is necessary party to suit, suit cannot be maintained and is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V. J Vincent (52 years years) Vakathara House, Jesus Road, Schoolpady, Vaduthala P.O, Pin – 682 023 Molly Vincent (61 years years) Vakathara House, Jesus Road, Schoolpady, Vaduthala P.O, 682 023 Siju Vincent (38 years years) Vakathara House, Jesus Road, Schoolpady, Vaduthala P.O, 682 023 Sibin Vincent (36 years years) Vakathara House, Jesus Road, Schoolpady, Vaduthala P.O, 682 023 Siya Vincent (34 years years) Vakathara House, Jesus Road, Schoolpady, Vaduthala P.O, 682 023

Defendants

V. J Raphel (Age not specified years) Vakathara House, Sahakarana Road, Vaduthala P.O, Pin – 682 023 Rajeena (Age not specified years) Valiyaparambil House, Vallarpadom, Ernakulam V. J Philomina @ Soyama (Age not specified years) Vakathara House, Vaduthala P.O, Pin - 682 023 V.J John @ Joshy (Age not specified years) Vakathara House, Janakeeya Road, Vaduthala, Pin - 682 023 V. J Martin (Age not specified years) Vakathara House, Kunnummal Road, Vaduthala, Pin – 682 023

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed against D1 as it cannot be maintained.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed against D1. As D1 is necessary party to suit, suit cannot be maintained and is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Thu, 11/05/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases