Case Summary
The case involves a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property. The plaintiff contends that new documents obtained recently are vital for substantiating his case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitions were dismissed due to the lack of merit and untimeliness.
The petitions were dismissed due to the lack of merit and untimeliness.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties shall bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
V Devashikhamony (70 years)
11544, Near Paltas Lane, Mattancherry, Kochi 682002
Defendants
Abdul Nazar Sait (47 years)
40/473, Munjappilly Bunglow, Jews Street, College P O, Ernakulam
The Additional Thahasildar (Age not specified years)
Taluk Office, Ernakulam- 682011
The Taluk Surveyor (Age not specified years)
Taluk office, Ernakulam, Kochi- 682011
The Village Officer (Age not specified years)
Ernakulam Village, Ernakulam, 682011
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff requested a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property.
Evidence:
The suit is only for injunction and there is no prayer for recovery of possession or declaration.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff was examined as PW1.
Reference:
Document Type:
Documents
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked as part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
Exts.A1 to A8
Document Type:
Documents
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked as part of the first defendant's evidence.
Reference:
Exts.B1 to B7
Document Type:
Documents
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked as part of the second defendant's evidence.
Reference:
Exts.B8 to B17
Document Type:
Documents
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The plaintiff sought to accept these documents related to his case.
Reference:
Documents produced in WP(C) 2285/13