Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 720/2022

Case between Usha M.P. vs Jaimy Sabu regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Usha M.P. is the plaintiff who has been absent for several court postings, while Jaimy Sabu is the defendant. The suit against the defendant was dismissed due to the plaintiff's repeated absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff after several postings. The costs were awarded to the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Usha M.P. (49 years years) Madathiparambil House, Thiruvankulam, Presently residing at rent in Krishibhavan Road, 10th Mile, Udayamperoor, Ernakulam District-682307

Defendants

Jaimy Sabu (50 years years) Kottalil House, Kottapady Desom, Kottapady Village, Kottamangalam Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-686 692

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases