O.S. No. 720/2022

Case between Usha M.P. vs Jaimy Sabu regarding dismissal for default

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.

Order Date

2024-03-05

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Usha M.P. is the plaintiff who has been absent for several court postings, while Jaimy Sabu is the defendant. The suit against the defendant was dismissed due to the plaintiff's repeated absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff after several postings. The costs were awarded to the defendant.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff after several postings. The costs were awarded to the defendant.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was repeatedly absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

It is noticed that plaintiff is absent for the last a few postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Usha M.P.
Party Age: 49
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jaimy Sabu
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Soman P. Paul
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Yash Thomas Mannully
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sibi Karun
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Aamina
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Evidence: