Case Summary
Usha Joseph filed a suit against Professional Service Innovations and Anandhu Krishnan for the recovery of Rs. 60,000 based on a promissory note. The case arose from a fraud related to a two-wheeler financing scheme that the defendants failed to fulfill.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 60,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case based on the documentation provided, including a promissory note.
The plaintiff established a case based on the documentation provided, including a promissory note.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs. 60,000 along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Usha Joseph (64 years)
Srambikkal House, Edakkunnam Village, Palambra Post, Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District. 686 518
Defendants
Professional Service innovations (Age not specified years)
Corrazone, Kalamassery, Thrikkakkara North Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Kochi, 682 022
Anandhu Krishnan (28 years)
Choorakulangara House, Kolapra, Kudayathoor Village, Todupuzha Taluk, Kudayathoor Post, Idukki District, 685 590
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.60,000/- along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree or realization.
Evidence:
Defendants shall pay Rs.60,000/- (Rupees Sixty thousand only) along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Promissory Note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the second defendant executed a promissory note for Rs.60,000/- in favor of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Online Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the online receipt of the payment of Rs.56,000/- deposited into the account of Federal Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Online Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the online receipt of Rs.4,000/- deposited into the account of Federal Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Receipt Voucher
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the receipt voucher for Rs.60,000/- issued by the first defendant showing the money was received.
Reference:
Ext.A4