Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 361 OF 2017

Case between Uppiliyath Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Uppiliyath Krishnankutty has filed a suit against Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd for the recovery of money related to shares and deposits in a scheme. The defendant did not contest the suit and was set ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in part, allowing the plaintiff to recover Rs. 95,196 from the defendant along with interest. The defendant is also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 95,196 with interest at 12% per annum until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in part, allowing the plaintiff to recover Rs. 95,196 from the defendant along with interest. The defendant is also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 95,196/- (Rupees Ninety Five Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Six only) from the defendant company and their assets with an interest at 12% per annum till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Uppiliyath Krishnankutty
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayachandran
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Share Certificate dated 12-1-2015, Pass Book
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Soumya Kooliparambil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 95,196/- from the defendant company.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree, as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Share Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the share certificate issued in favor of the plaintiff for the shares purchased from the defendant company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the payments made by the plaintiff towards the 'Swarnna Sambadya Scheme' conducted by the defendant company.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of investment amount
Case Code
Case between Uppiliyath Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Uppiliyath Krishnankutty vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won