Case Summary
Unnikrishnan, the petitioner, filed an execution petition against Raj Kiran and Rajan TM, the respondents. The court dismissed the execution petition due to the respondents being reported from Bangalore.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition could not be executed due to the respondents' location.
The execution petition could not be executed due to the respondents' location.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition could not be executed due to the respondents' location.
The execution petition could not be executed due to the respondents' location.
Supporting Evidence
The court indicated that the execution petition cannot be executed since the respondents reported to be from Bangalore.
Judgment Evidence:
EP cannot be executed. EP dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raj Kiran
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan TM
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Prasad C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution petition dismissed based on the absence of the judgment debtors.
Evidence:
Hence, EP cannot be executed. EP dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishnan vs Raj Kiran et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishnan vs Raj Kiran et al regarding execution petition