Case Summary
Unnikrishnan filed a complaint against C.H Beeran alleging a violation of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the accused not guilty.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted of the charges brought under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the complaint lacking sufficient grounds for conviction.
Key Reasoning:
The court acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence supporting the complaint.
The court acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence supporting the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The court acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence supporting the complaint.
The court acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence supporting the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
The court acquitted the accused due to lack of evidence supporting the complaint.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.H Beeran
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.I. Charles
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.C Naseer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishnan vs C.H Beeran regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishnan vs C.H Beeran regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act