Case Summary
Unnikrishnan filed a case against Ambujam and others regarding the reported delivery effect leading to the closure of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Closure of Execution Proceedings
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The reported delivery was effected, leading to the closure of the Execution Proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
DH represented reported delivery effected hence E.P stand closed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambujam
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalyani
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lakshmi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Susheela (late)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumathi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udayan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ushakumari
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gangadevi
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rini.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Closure of Execution Proceedings
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Due to the reported delivery effect
Evidence:
DH represented reported delivery effected hence E.P stand closed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2018