Case Summary
Unnikrishanan filed a suit against Boby Mathew and Jaya K.M. The plaintiff was absent for multiple hearings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for non-prosecution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not attend court hearings and failed to file necessary documents.
The plaintiff did not attend court hearings and failed to file necessary documents.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not attend court hearings and failed to file necessary documents.
The plaintiff did not attend court hearings and failed to file necessary documents.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff remained absent, no representation. Plaintiff continuously absent for last several postings since 06.11.2024.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishanan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Boby Mathew
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaya K.M
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Mohammed Rafeeq
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gikku Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishanan vs Boby Mathew et al regarding non prosecution of a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishanan vs Boby Mathew et al regarding non prosecution of a civil suit.