Case Summary
The case was filed by the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against the defendant. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearings, and no representation was made for them.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were continuously absent and made no representation.
The plaintiffs were continuously absent and made no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent and no representation. Plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation as well.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unni Krishnan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Babu
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vivek.N.S
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayalekshmi
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bitty Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26(2) Order VII Rule 1 to 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Injunction.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unni Krishnan et al vs Jayalekshmi regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Unni Krishnan et al vs Jayalekshmi regarding Injunction