Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1965/2022

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sharath. R et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-03
Duration
approximately-3 years
Case Code No.
1965
Case Closed
Mon, 11/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India, represented by its Branch Manager Sri. Rajan.K, is the plaintiff. The defendants are Sharath. R and Rajendran. The case was dismissed for default due to lack of proper steps for issuing summons to the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's failure to take proper steps to issue summons to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's failure to take proper steps to issue summons to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager Sri. Rajan.K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sharath. R
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendran
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Jagadish Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prajith J.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. Saji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to lack of proper steps taken to issue summons to the defendant.
Evidence:
Since, no proper steps seen taken to issue summons to the defendant after elapse of more than 2 years, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won