Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP. 289/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sekar S regarding execution proceedings

Court
COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Leena Rasheed
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration
Case Code No.
289
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India has filed a petition against Sekar S for execution proceedings. The case is currently stalled as the respondent is reported to be abroad.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The execution petition is closed for the time being, allowing it to be revived when the respondent is available.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition is closed for the time being, allowing it to be revived when the respondent is available.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

EP stands closed for the time being with liberty to revive as and when JD is available within the jurisdiction.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Rep. By its Senior Manager and Principal Officer, Jim Mathew Kattakayam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sekar S
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Reply letter issued by Kozhikode Corporation to K. Binoy, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Smitha Dharmaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sakkeer K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
EP stands closed for the time being with liberty to revive as and when JD is available.
Evidence:
EP stands closed for the time being with liberty to revive as and when JD is available within the jurisdiction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Reply letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced this document as part of the petitioner's evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witness testimony was considered, particularly from the Senior Manager, Union Bank of India.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shalu A.V regarding execution petition.
THE COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Iqlas N.P regarding Execution Petition
COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Raghavan V regarding mediation settlement
COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bnak vs Mr. Abdul Salam N.V regarding default dismissal of execution petition
COMMERCIAL COURT, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Babu T.P regarding execution of decree
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won