Case Summary
Union Bank of India filed a suit against Muraleedharan R and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's application to not press the memo resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muraleedharan R
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syamala Kumari M P
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arya Stores
- Relation
- Proprietor: Muraleedharan R
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Clareness Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sabu K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Muraleedharan R et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Muraleedharan R et al regarding dismissal of suit