Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1220/2022

Case between Union Bank of India vs Manojkumar M.R regarding loan recovery

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-7 years 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Manojkumar M.R for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant acknowledged the debt but failed to repay, leading to legal action by the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay Rs. 2,90,102.38 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the litigation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence supporting the claim for repayment of the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence supporting the claim for repayment of the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹2,90,102.38 (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety Thousand One Hundred and Two and Paise Thirty-Eight only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manojkumar M.R
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Sanction letter, Demand promissory note, Letter of continuity, Term loan Agreement (Hypothecation), General Term loan Agreement, Interest Agreement, Letter issued to the Manager, Plaintiff Bank, Debit Balance confirmation, Copy of the legal notice issued to the defendant, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bertrand Basil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Vasu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant to pay the amount of Rs. 2,90,102.38 along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹2,90,102.38 (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety Thousand One Hundred and Two and Paise Thirty-Eight only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to the costs of litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant to request financial assistance.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided terms and conditions of the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document executed by the defendant acknowledging the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the security documents for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Term loan Agreement (Hypothecation)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing hypothecation of movables as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: General term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional documentation relating to the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement specifying the interest terms for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter issued to the Manager, Plaintiff Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document concerning the defendant's request for installment repayments.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Debit Balance confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of indebtedness by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of the legal notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal notice demanding repayment of outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document reflecting the financial transaction history related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Manojkumar M.R regarding loan recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Manojkumar M.R regarding loan recovery

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/02/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won