Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.712/2021

Case between Union Bank of India vs M. Sreevidhya regarding realization of loan amount.

Court
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Judge
Sri. Sidhik. K
Order Date
2025-01-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against M. Sreevidhya for the realization of loan amounts totaling Rs.8,98,000 due to the plaintiff's claims of fraud involving spurious gold pledged by the defendant. The court examined the evidence and testimonies regarding the loans and the fraudulent activities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.8,98,000 along with interest. The plaintiff's claim of fraudulent activity was found to be substantiated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,98,000/- to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.8,98,000 along with interest. The plaintiff's claim of fraudulent activity was found to be substantiated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged testimony and evidence demonstrated that the defendant committed fraud by pledging spurious gold as security for loans.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged testimony and evidence demonstrated that the defendant committed fraud by pledging spurious gold as security for loans.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 coupled with documents Exts. A1 to A9 very well shows that the defendants failed to repay the outstanding amount with interest to plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,98,000/- (Rupees eight lakh ninety eight thousand only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Sreevidhya
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext. A1 (Letter from Regional Head showing spurious gold), Ext. A2 (Complaint to Police), Ext. A3 (Copy of FIR), Ext. A4 (Seizure Mahazer), Ext. A5 (Seizure Mahazer), Ext. A6 (Statement of account for Rs.4,20,000), Ext. A7 (Statement of account for Rs.4,78,000), Ext. A8 (Application for Rs.4,20,000), Ext. A9 (Application for Rs.4,78,000)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Sanjeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mintoob Chand.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sanal Kumar Padannapurath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.8,98,000/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the suit is liable to be decreed directing the defendant to pay the outstanding amount.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization of the decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation of the decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter from Regional Head
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows spurious gold found during internal audit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint given by the Regional Head to the police.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Photo Copy of FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the FIR submitted to the magistrate.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Seizure Mahazer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued showing seizure of the pledged ornaments.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Seizure Mahazer
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued showing seizure of documents by the police.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original statement of account for the loan for Rs.4,20,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original statement of account for the loan for Rs.4,78,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Common Application – cum-jewel loan pledge
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy regarding the gold loan for Rs.4,20,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Common Application – cum-jewel loan pledge
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy regarding the gold loan for Rs.4,78,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Fraud
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs M. Sreevidhya regarding realization of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs M. Sreevidhya regarding realization of loan amount.

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 09/28/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KPB Nidhi Ltd. vs Bipin P et al regarding realization of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aleena Johney et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal bank Ltd. vs MR. Jafer C. V regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/ 1st ADDL.SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vijas K.P et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/II nd ADDL. SUB JUDGE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sreeraj.P regarding realisation of amount from the defendant.
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won