Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No 531/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Jayakmari et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- I
Judge
Sri. Manesh. S.V Additional Munsiff-I
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against multiple defendants for recovery of a loan amount that they had failed to repay. The defendants were members of a group that took a loan from the bank but did not honor the repayment terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from the defendants. The defendants were found jointly and severally liable for the repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,19,939/- with interest at the rate of 11.65% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from the defendants. The defendants were found jointly and severally liable for the repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its case through uncontroverted evidence, including loan agreements and testimony.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The defendants chose to remain exparte till conclusion of the proceedings and there is nothing offered before Court to disbelieve the version of plaintiff which remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,19,939/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Nineteen thousand nine hundred and thirty nine only) with interest at the rate of 11.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakmari
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tintu.S
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reshmi. T.G
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhi.S
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayasree.P
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Hypothecation Agreement, Promissory Note, Letter (SD), Interest agreement, Letter of Continuity, Legal Notices, Acknowledgment Cards, Unserved notices, Postal receipts, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Soumya G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
1.Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.9,19,939/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Nineteen thousand nine hundred and thirty nine only) with interest at the rate of 11.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed necessary document for the SHG loan sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the documents executed by the defendants for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter (SD)
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication sent to defendants regarding the loan status.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the interest terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document ensuring continuity of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notices sent to the defendants for loan recovery.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cards acknowledging the receipt of notices sent to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Unserved Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notices that were not served to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts indicating the postal dispatch of notices to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the outstanding amount due to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Jayakmari et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Jayakmari et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 09/17/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won