Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 770/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs B Studio Boutique regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against B Studio Boutique for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan, leading to this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the defendant owed ₹4,45,689.48. A decree was issued for the recovery of this amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹4,45,689.48 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the defendant owed ₹4,45,689.48. A decree was issued for the recovery of this amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence from the plaintiff stood uncontested and supported the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence from the plaintiff stood uncontested and supported the claim.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,45,689.48/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B Studio Boutique Proprietor Ms. Bineetha K Bose
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application Form, Demand Promissory Note, Letter of Continuity, Term Loan Agreement, Interest Agreement, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Returned Postal envelope, Computer print out of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nithin Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover ₹4,45,689.48 with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹4,45,689.48/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant to establish the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the defendant's obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the continuation of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defines the terms of the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the interest terms applicable to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that a legal notice was sent to the defendant for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of attempted communication with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account for the period from 28.01.2024 to 04.06.2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial transactions and outstanding amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs B Studio Boutique regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs B Studio Boutique regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won