O.S. No.787 /2020

Case between Uni Agencies vs S D Contractors et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.

Order Date

2024-01-20

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a plaintiff, Uni Agencies, represented by Vijayakumar, against the defendants S D Contractors and Sinu Lal. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's failure to issue summons to the defendants after repeated directions.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to take necessary steps for the prosecution of the case.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to issue summons to the defendants despite repeated directions from the court.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to issue summons to the defendants despite repeated directions from the court.

Supporting Evidence

No steps are seen taken for issuing summons to D1,D2 even after repeated directions and giving sufficient time.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vijayakumar
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: S D Contractors
Party Age: 40
Relation: represented through its proprietor

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sinu Lal
Party Age: 40
Relation: Proprietor

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P. Sathisan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Krishna G. Nath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit is dismissed for default due to lack of steps taken for issuing summons.

Evidence: