Case Summary
Umesh and Gireesh Kumar.G are plaintiffs seeking to appoint an advocate commissioner for a general body meeting of the Press Club. They allege that the defendants are conducting the meeting undemocratically, affecting upcoming elections.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application for appointing an advocate commissioner, ruling that the contentions raised by the plaintiffs were not meritorious.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the application was not necessary for a just decision.
The court found that the application was not necessary for a just decision.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the application was not necessary for a just decision.
The court found that the application was not necessary for a just decision.
Supporting Evidence
the court is of the view that appointing an advocate commissioner as an observer is not be necessary for the just decision of the case at hand.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: the application is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Umesh
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gireesh Kumar.G
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The press club
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, Press Club
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M. Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Balachandran Kulasekharam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thonakkal G.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajithkumar S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.Ram Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Krishnasree S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Request to appoint an advocate commissioner as an observer for the general body meeting of the first respondent.
Evidence:
the court is of the view that appointing an advocate commissioner as an observer is not be necessary for the just decision of the case at hand. Hence, this court is of the view that the application is only liable to be dismissed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Umesh vs The press club regarding appointment of an advocate commissioner
Case Code Year
Case between Umesh vs The press club regarding appointment of an advocate commissioner