Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 979/2022

Case between Uma Murthi vs Dr. K. Vijayakumar et al regarding suit rejection due to unpaid court fees.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Uma Murthi, the plaintiff, brought the case against Dr. K. Vijayakumar and others. The court rejected the suit for failure to pay the balance court fee despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff did not appear and the defendants were represented. The suit was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the suit for lack of representation and unpaid fees.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following:- Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 18th day of August, 2025).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Uma Murthi (52 years) Flat No. 102, Kalatmak Residency, Vidyanagar, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Cochin - 20

Defendants

Dr. K. Vijayakumar (Age not specified years) " Udayam", QS Road, Kollam – 691 001 Dr. Anil Vijayakumar (Age not specified years) "Udayam", QS Road, Kollam – 691 001 Sivapatham (Age not specified years) Flat No. 202, Kalatmak Residency, Vidyanagar, Vidyanagar, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Cochin – 682 020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases