Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 79 of 2016

Case between Ullattil Muhammed vs Bava regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-07
Duration
Less than 1 year
Case Closed
Wed, 12/07/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff sought partition of co-owned property after series of inheritances and deaths among family members.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed partition of the property into two equal shares granting one share each to the plaintiff and the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition into two equal shares; Entitled to get one share in the property
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed partition of the property into two equal shares granting one share each to the plaintiff and the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established his case with cogent and reliable evidence as defendant opted to remain ex-parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established his case with cogent and reliable evidence as defendant opted to remain ex-parte.
Supporting Evidence
Case of the plaintiff is that plaint schedule property belonged to Ullattil Kalandhan @ Bapputty. As per purchase certificate...

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, I hold a view that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and they are entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon
Party Age
52
Relation
Son of Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bava
Party Age
55
Relation
Son of Bappu
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext. A1 to A5 and A6 series
Defendants Documents
Not Applicable

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To divide the property into two equal shares and allocate one share to the plaintiff
Evidence:
I hold a view that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence and they are entitled for a decree as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of property ownership
Reference:
Ext. A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kalandhan @ Bapputty's death certificate
Reference:
Ext. A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Ayishakutty
Reference:
Ext. A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipts for property payment
Reference:
Ext. A6 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ullattil Muhammed vs Bava regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Ullattil Muhammed vs Bava regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 11/07/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/07/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 12/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Sat, 12/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won