Case Summary
Ullas K.B and Dr. K.C.Haridas are petitioners complaining against Pramuda for illegally treating animals in a residential community, causing disturbances and health risks to residents. The court is considering a request for an interim injunction to stop this activity.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction against the respondent from conducting consultation/examination/treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
Judgment Evidence:
An order of interim injunction is passed as against the respondent as follows: i. The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any sort of consultation/ examination of or treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property, till the disposal of the suit.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Ullas K.B (42 years years)
Villa No.2. Relcon Midtown Villas, T.D.Sannidhi Road, Thammanam, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam – 682 032.
Dr. K.C.Haridas (67 years years)
Villa No.9, Relcon Midtown Villas, T.D.Sannidhi Road, Thammanam, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam – 682 032.
Defendants
Pramuda (63 years years)
Villa No.10, Relcon Midtown Villas, T.D.Sannidhi Road, Thammanam, Kochi – 682 032.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Interim prohibitory injunction against the defendant conducting treatment of animals.
Evidence:
The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any sort of consultation/ examination of or treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property, till the disposal of the suit.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiffs' enjoyment of their property.
Evidence:
The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained from obstructing or disturbing the peaceful enjoyment of plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs or anyone through or under them.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Stop Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation to stop the defendant from conducting her clinic.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court pertaining to the defendant's conduct.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs provided by the petitioners to establish their case.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court related to the defendant's case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court regarding the defendant's conduct.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order in Contempt Case regarding defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type:
Certificate of Registration
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate proving the defendant's registration as a veterinary practitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from the Registrar of the Kerala State Veterinary Council to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type:
Government Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Government order related to veterinary practitioner operations.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from Kerala State Pollution Control Board regarding the defendant's premises.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report providing evidence on the defendant's activities.
Reference:
Ext.C1