Case Summary
Ullas K.B and Dr. K.C.Haridas are petitioners complaining against Pramuda for illegally treating animals in a residential community, causing disturbances and health risks to residents. The court is considering a request for an interim injunction to stop this activity.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction against the respondent from conducting consultation/examination/treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an interim injunction preventing Pramuda from conducting animal treatment at her villa, citing concerns over public safety and disturbances to the residential community.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioners based on the disturbances caused by the respondent's activities.
Supporting Evidence
The party raises a case that the respondent is illegally and improperly conducting treatment of animals within the injunction B schedule property, which falls within a gated community, and such acts had caused and is having the possibility of causing danger to the residents in the gated community.
Judgment Evidence:
An order of interim injunction is passed as against the respondent as follows: i. The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any sort of consultation/ examination of or treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property, till the disposal of the suit.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ullas K.B
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. K.C.Haridas
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pramuda
- Party Age
- 63
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Stop Memo issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation, Copy of Order in WP(c) No. 4871/2025 of Hon’ble High Court, Photographs (10 Nos)
Defendants Documents
Copy of Order in WP(c) No.4871/2025 of Hon’ble High Court, Copy of Order in WP(c) No. 8948/2024, Order in Contempt Case No. 3152/2024, Copy of Certificate of Registration, Copy of the letter issued by Registrar of the Kerala State Veterinary Council, Copy of Govt. Order No. 589/2023/AHD of the Animal Husbandry Department, Copy of letter issued by Kerala State Pollution Control Board
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhi John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Asha T.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. A Shaji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amal M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Riyan Augustine Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Interim prohibitory injunction against the defendant conducting treatment of animals.
Evidence:
The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any sort of consultation/ examination of or treatment of animals in the injunction B schedule property, till the disposal of the suit.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiffs' enjoyment of their property.
Evidence:
The defendant or any persons claiming through or under her or her agents and men are restrained from obstructing or disturbing the peaceful enjoyment of plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs or anyone through or under them.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Stop Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation to stop the defendant from conducting her clinic.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court pertaining to the defendant's conduct.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs provided by the petitioners to establish their case.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court related to the defendant's case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order from Hon’ble High Court regarding the defendant's conduct.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Order in Contempt Case regarding defendant's actions.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type:
Certificate of Registration
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Certificate proving the defendant's registration as a veterinary practitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from the Registrar of the Kerala State Veterinary Council to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type:
Government Order
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Government order related to veterinary practitioner operations.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Letter from Kerala State Pollution Control Board regarding the defendant's premises.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report providing evidence on the defendant's activities.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ullas K.B vs Pramuda regarding interim prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ullas K.B vs Pramuda regarding interim prohibitory injunction