Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 82/ 2023

Case between Ullas et al vs Chandrika regarding Petition for Commission

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-01-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Ullas and others against Chandrika regarding the appointment of an advocate commissioner and surveyor. The court allowed the petition and appointed officials for conducting inspections.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and appointed officials for conducting inspections.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate commissioner and Surveyor
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and appointed officials for conducting inspections.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recognized the necessity of appointing officials for conducting inspections.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court recognized the necessity of appointing officials for conducting inspections.
Supporting Evidence
The court recognized the necessity of appointing officials for conducting inspections.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is allowed. Advocate Mr. Joy Bhaskar is appointed as the Advocate commissioner and Sri. Sivanandan is appointed as the Surveyor.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ullas
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gurudas
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gadha
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abhilash@ Bhuvanachandranathan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Others
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrika
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vakkom. R. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Joy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed, and an Advocate commissioner is appointed.
Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate commissioner to conduct an inspection and issue a report.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ullas et al vs Chandrika regarding Petition for Commission
Case Code Year
Case between Ullas et al vs Chandrika regarding Petition for Commission

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won