Case Summary
UCO bank filed a suit against M/S Red Cherries and Nikithakumari. The court dismissed the suit due to lack of representation by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and take action despite given opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff provided no representation.
The plaintiff provided no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff provided no representation.
The plaintiff provided no representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. No fresh steps taken, despite opportunities given.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- UCO bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/S Red Cherries, Bakery and Restaurant
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Nikithakumari B.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. C.S. Sreelatha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. No fresh steps taken, despite opportunities given. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between UCO bank vs M/S Red Cherries et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between UCO bank vs M/S Red Cherries et al regarding suit dismissal for default