Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EA. 113/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs Aneesha.A.S et al regarding Execution Application

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Code No.
113
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves UCO Bank as the petitioner seeking to restore an execution petition that was dismissed for default. The respondents, Aneesha.A.S and others, did not participate in the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution application filed by UCO Bank was allowed by the court, granting an opportunity to proceed with the execution petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The execution application filed by UCO Bank was allowed by the court, granting an opportunity to proceed with the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it appropriate to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner based on the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it appropriate to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner based on the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice, I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the Execution petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Execution Application allowed. Since the respondents remained exparte, no costs ordered.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aneesha.A.S
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ameer Khan
Party Age
54
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja.S.
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G.Baiju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
One more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the Execution petition.
Evidence:
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the Execution petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
EA.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Seenath Unnisa regarding petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Manoj. J regarding petition for decree
COURT OF MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kazhakkuttam Service Co-operative bank Limited vs Prasad M.L regarding Execution of Attachment
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs V.Shailaja Kumari et al regarding execution of a decree
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Execution Application Defendant Won
Case between Pattom Service Cooperative bank Ltd vs Shajira regarding execution application.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Application Plaintiff Won