Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 427/2022

Case between T.S.Maya vs C.A.Pradeep regarding dismissal of the suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
approximately-2 years 0 days
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff T.S.Maya was not present and ready for evidence after multiple opportunities. The case was ultimately dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to present evidence after multiple opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to present evidence after multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was not ready for evidence despite being given multiple chances.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case and seeks time for evidence. Suit had been listed on multiple times, innumerous opportunities had been afforded for pre-trial steps.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.S.Maya
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.A.Pradeep
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.S.Maya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh R Shenoy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Silesh S. Prabhu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saumya T.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K Revi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C. N Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arya K.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tony George Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S Muhammed Shefin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's unpreparedness for evidence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.S.Maya vs C.A.Pradeep regarding dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between T.S.Maya vs C.A.Pradeep regarding dismissal of the suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 07/15/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won