Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1299/2016

Case between T.Selvaran et al vs M.K.Ayyappan et al regarding plaint rejection

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-06-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs T.Selvaran and Sreekala Unni, and defendants M.K.Ayyappan and Lalu. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff failed to represent the case and did not remit the legal benefit fund.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to lack of representation from the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.Selvaran (33 years years) Thachonamnikathil, Edapally North, Kunnumpuram P.O, Cochin – 682 024, Ernakulam District Sreekala Unni (32 years years) Thengathara house, Kochi taluk, Njarkkal P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 506

Defendants

M.K.Ayyappan (70 years years) Punnakkattu house, Pallilamkara, Thrikkakara village, Kanayannur taluk, Kalamassery P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 503 Lalu (35 years years) Punnakkattu house, Pallilamkara, Thrikkakara village, Kanayanur taluk, Kalamassery P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to absence and lack of representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Not represented. Legal Benefit Fund not seen remitted. Multiple opportunities has been given already. No representation from the part of the plaintiff. Hence plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases