Case Summary
T.Sarojini Amma is the plaintiff who filed the suit against defendants Anitha and Balamurali. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not appear in court to represent her case.
Key Reasoning:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T.Sarojini Amma
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balamurali
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Latheesh Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Binitha James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.V.Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Raju V Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Harisankar K.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.Sarojini Amma vs Anitha, Balamurali regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between T.Sarojini Amma vs Anitha, Balamurali regarding dismissal for default