Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 105/2023

Case between T.Sarojini Amma vs Anitha, Balamurali regarding dismissal for default

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-05-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

T.Sarojini Amma is the plaintiff who filed the suit against defendants Anitha and Balamurali. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not appear in court to represent her case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not applicable

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.Sarojini Amma (82 years years) Thekkumthala veedu, House no 65/4487, Roots Enclave, SRM Road, Ernakulam North P.O, Ernakulam – 682 018

Defendants

Anitha (53 years years) Pulari house, Kalady P.O, Ernakulam – 683 574 Balamurali (25 years years) Pulari house, Kalady P.O, Ernakulam – 683 574

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases