Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.986/2019

Case between Treesa Peter vs Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Treesa Peter filed a suit against the defendant Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not interested in presenting evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not interested in adducing evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Treesa Peter (38 years) 382 X111, Muralika Thurithissery, Meycaud.P.O., Temple Ernakulam, Pin – 683 589

Defendants

Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. (Age not specified years) Pilickal Building Near Ernakulam Medical Centre, NH Bye Pass, Palarivattom, Cochin Kerala, Pin – 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases