Case Summary
The plaintiff Treesa Peter filed a suit against the defendant Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not interested in presenting evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not interested in adducing evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Treesa Peter
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.K. Mohanlal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Treesa Peter vs Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Treesa Peter vs Tata Capital Financial Serviced Ltd. regarding suit dismissal for default