Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1318 OF 2017

Case between T.P. Shaiju vs P.P. Vasudevan regarding restoration of dismissed suit for money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.
Order Date
2017-08-10
Duration
3 years 2 months 5 days
Case Closed
Thu, 08/10/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed for restoration of a dismissed suit for money realization citing inability to appear in court due to job-related travel.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays a cost of Rs. 6,000 to the respondent by a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit on condition of paying cost
Case Type
Civil Procedure - Order IX Rule 13 for restoration
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays a cost of Rs. 6,000 to the respondent by a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner provided valid reasons and evidence for non-appearance, justifying the setting aside of the ex-parte decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner provided valid reasons and evidence for non-appearance, justifying the setting aside of the ex-parte decree.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner was residing at Trichur and had to go to Trivandrum in connection with his job, justifying his non-appearance before the court.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition was allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000 by the petitioner to respondent by a specific date. In default of payment of cost, the petition shall stand dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.P. Shaiju
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.P. Vasudevan
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o. Govindan
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of suit
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit on condition of paying cost of Rs.6,000 to the respondent
Evidence:
The petition was allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.6,000 by the petitioner to respondent by a specific date. In default of payment of cost, the petition shall stand dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure - Order IX Rule 13 for restoration
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.P. Shaiju vs P.P. Vasudevan regarding restoration of dismissed suit for money realization
Case Code Year
Case between T.P. Shaiju vs P.P. Vasudevan regarding restoration of dismissed suit for money realization

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/10/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Nazeer Chenmala et al regarding default petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur
Default Petition Defendant Won
Case between Secretary vs Shamsudheen et al regarding default petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Default Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Kattil Peediyekkal Musthafa regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Default Judgment Defendant Won
Case between Othukkungal Panchayath Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Melath Fakrudheen et al regarding default judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Default Judgment Defendant Won