Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 477 /2021

Case between Topic Drug Lines vs Shaju Antony et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Topic Drug Lines, engaged in the pharmaceutical business, filed a suit against the defendants, Shaju Antony and his son, for the recovery of outstanding dues for supplied goods. They supplied goods on credit, but the defendants failed to make payments, leading to this lawsuit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to prove any monetary transaction or a business relationship with the defendants. Thus, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to prove any monetary transaction or a business relationship with the defendants. Thus, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish that the defendants are the proprietors of the hospitals or that there was any business transaction.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to establish that the defendants are the proprietors of the hospitals or that there was any business transaction.
Supporting Evidence
The court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of a monetary transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants, or that the defendants are the proprietors of the respective clinics and hospital.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajendran K K
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaju Antony
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sachin
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True Computer printout of General Ledger issued to the defendant with respect to Maria Clinic, True Computer printout of General Ledger issued to the defendant with respect to St. Philominas Hospital, Lawyer notice, Acknowledgment card signed by 2nd Defendant, Postal cover returned with endorsement intimated, by Postal department.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sunny P Markose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeemon John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akhila N S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding dues along with applicable interest and incidental charges.
Evidence:
the court concludes that the plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of a monetary transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants, or that the defendants are the proprietors of the respective clinics and hospital.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: General Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer printout for the period from 02.12.2019 to 14.03.2020, pertaining to Maria Clinic.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: General Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer printouts for the period from 11.12.2019 to 21.09.2020, relating to St. Philomina Hospital.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice dated 13.02.2021 issued to the defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card signed by the second defendant for the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal cover returned with an endorsement from the postal department.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Topic Drug Lines vs Shaju Antony et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Topic Drug Lines vs Shaju Antony et al regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/13/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won