Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 344/2020

Case between T.J Laisa vs A.C. Chummar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, T.J Laisa, filed a suit against A.C. Chummar and M/s. Dew Drops. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was not present or ready for ex parte evidence despite numerous chances. Therefore, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff was not present or ready for ex parte evidence despite numerous chances. Therefore, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite several opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite several opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
The judgment states that the plaintiff was not present or ready for the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

Despite innumerous chances plaintiff not present or ready for ex parte evidence. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.J Laisa
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.C. Chummar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Dew Drops
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susanth Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ranimol M.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fathima Sulfath N.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dajish John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Basil Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff not present or ready for ex parte evidence.
Evidence:
Despite innumerous chances plaintiff not present or ready for ex parte evidence. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T.J Laisa vs A.C. Chummar et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between T.J Laisa vs A.C. Chummar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won