Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 675/2020

Case between THUSHARA AJITH vs BAIJU C.P regarding a civil suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Thushara Ajith, was involved in a civil suit against the defendant, Baiju C.P. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence from court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest and absence in previous hearings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of interest and absence in previous hearings.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not show interest in prosecuting the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not show interest in prosecuting the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff continuously absent for last several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with this case. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
THUSHARA AJITH
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
BAIJU C.P
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.K. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith S.R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N. Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Janardhana Shenoy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between THUSHARA AJITH vs BAIJU C.P regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between THUSHARA AJITH vs BAIJU C.P regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won