Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Thresia Augustine@Reetha and others, filed a suit against the defendants, including V.M.Joseph and others, seeking a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction. The court found that the parties reached a voluntary compromise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the compromise.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded a compromise agreement between the parties and decreed the suit as per the terms of the compromise. There was no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and the terms were lawful.
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and the terms were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and the terms were lawful.
The court found that the parties entered into the compromise voluntarily and the terms were lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced that the parties have entered into the compromise voluntarily. As per Order 23 Rule 3, this court is satisfied that suit has been adjusted wholly and defendants paid amount to the full and final satisfaction of case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise. In the facts and circumstance of this case there shall be no order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thresia Augustine@Reetha
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o late K.P.Augustine
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Philomina
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o late K.P.Augustine and W/o K.C.James
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Elizabeth
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- D/o late K.P.Augustine and W/o Joy
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alphonsa
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o late K.P.Augustine
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.M.Joseph
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o V.M Mathewues
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Philomina Sebastian
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o Late Sebastian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tessy Sebastian
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o Late Sebastian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepak George
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o late George
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mukesh.S.Jayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ramkumar.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amrin Fathima
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sumesh.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.A.Shaji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.O.Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Javalin Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anupama.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anoopa M.J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sanu.S.Malakeel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ashwin Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The compromise in writing is signed by the parties.
Evidence:
The terms of the compromise are lawful and hence the compromise is recorded.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thresia Augustine@Reetha et al vs V.M.Joseph et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Thresia Augustine@Reetha et al vs V.M.Joseph et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement