OS. No.1145/2020

Case between Thresi vs Lusi Lawrence regarding suit dismissal

Court

Court of the Additional Munsiff-III

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi. C

Order Date

2025-02-24

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 02/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Thresi as the plaintiff and Lusi Lawrence as the defendant regarding a civil suit. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court found that the plaintiff did not represent the case during multiple postings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court found that the plaintiff did not represent the case during multiple postings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence from court proceedings and lack of representation.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence from court proceedings and lack of representation.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was continuously absent on previous postings and no representation was made on side of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Hence suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thresi
Party Age: 44
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lusi Lawrence
Party Age: 55
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Ajeesh.M.S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt. Vakkom Lali Sunil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.Durga
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit stands dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Evidence: