Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 131/2023

Case between Thomas Mathew vs Habeeb Nisha regarding possession of petition schedule building

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-06-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thomas Mathew filed a rent control petition against Habeeb Nisha. The parties reached a settlement, and the respondent handed over possession of the building to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the settlement between the parties and dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Matter settled between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thomas Mathew (65 years) Puthuvallchira House, Ganapathy Temple Road, Vaduthala, Ernakulam, Kochi­682 023

Defendants

Habeeb Nisha (45 years) Murshid Manzil, No. 43/996, Radha Mill Road, Pachalam (PO), Ernakulam District­682 012

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondent handed over possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner.
Evidence:
Matter settled between the parties submitted by both counsels. Filed a memo stating that, respondent handed over possession of petition schedule building to the petitioner and key also handed over.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases