Case Summary
Thomas Katticaren is the plaintiff in this case against Benny P. Thomas and several other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of readiness to present evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The Plaintiff though present in listed case is not ready for evidence and the proof affidavit is also even not filed. Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- THOMAS KATTICAREN
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- BENNY P. THOMAS
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- HARIDAS
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SHEENA KATTICAREN
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- MINU ROY
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- JITHESH JYOTHY
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Chirayath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji M. Varkey
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.M Shajahan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A. Rajagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Viswanath Salish
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Asher Revi Job
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Sudheeshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.B Dayal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika N. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff not being ready for evidence and not filing the proof affidavit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff though present is not ready for evidence and has not even filed the proof affidavit or served its copy till 1.00 P.M, wherein the suit was called multiple time before court today, in a listed case. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between THOMAS KATTICAREN vs BENNY P. THOMAS et al regarding plaintiff's readiness for evidence
Case Code Year
Case between THOMAS KATTICAREN vs BENNY P. THOMAS et al regarding plaintiff's readiness for evidence