Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.372/2011

Case between Thomas et al vs Raju et al regarding civil procedure

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-26
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Thomas, filed a suit against the defendants including Raju. The case involved proceedings for the withdrawal of the suit allowing for the possibility of filing a fresh suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit, giving liberty to file a fresh suit without any costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit, giving liberty to file a fresh suit without any costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit with the option to initiate a new one.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit with the option to initiate a new one.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

I.A.21/24 allowed. Plaintiff permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o late Joseph
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joby Thomas
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o late Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Sreedharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswambharan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o Paramu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Bhaskaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Varghese Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.K.Kishore
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinimol.P.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dennis Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese.P. Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit
Evidence:
I.A.21/24 allowed. Plaintiff permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file fresh suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thomas et al vs Raju et al regarding civil procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Thomas et al vs Raju et al regarding civil procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 03/26/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won