Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 144/2020

Case between Thomas C Kondody vs Jonson M Varkey regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Judge
Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Code No.
144
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a complaint filed by the complainant Thomas C Kondody against Jonson M Varkey for dishonouring a cheque of ₹25,00,000. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to three months of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹25,00,000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The complainant is entitled to ₹25,00,000 as compensation and interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the cheque amount from the date of the cheque until realization.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to three months of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹25,00,000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant proved that the cheque was issued towards repayment of a legally enforceable debt and was dishonoured for insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has successfully proved that Exhibit P1 cheque was issued towards repayment of ₹25,00,000. The cheque was dishonoured for 'Funds Insufficient' and despite due notice, the accused failed to make payment.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: In view of the above findings, the accused is found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas C Kondody
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jonson M Varkey
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.673329 dated 13.03.2019, Notice dated 08.05.2019, Lawyer’s notice dated 10.05.2019, Postal receipt, A/D Card.
Defendants Documents
Statement of accounts, Certification.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johnson M Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaison Palayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is ordered to pay a fine of 25,00,000/- to the complainant.
Evidence:
The accused shall pay a fine of 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs) and in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three (3) months.
Relief Type: Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation awarded to the complainant from the fine amount.
Evidence:
Out of the fine amount, a sum of 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs) shall be paid to the complainant as compensation under Section 357(1)(b) Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Punishment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused sentenced to simple imprisonment.
Evidence:
The accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for three (3) months.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the cheque amount awarded until realization.
Evidence:
The complainant shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the cheque amount from the date of the cheque until realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the accused was dishonoured for insufficient funds.
Reference:
P1
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice issued by the complainant regarding the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
P2
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statutory notice sent to the accused regarding payment of the cheque.
Reference:
P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the statutory notice.
Reference:
P4
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of delivery of the statutory notice to the accused.
Reference:
P5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document produced by the defense relating to financial transactions.
Reference:
X1
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certification related to the financial transactions in question.
Reference:
X1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
3 months

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/10/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. M.M Publications Ltd. vs P S Mohammed Basheer regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd vs Abey regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won