Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 128/2024

Case between Thomas A.P vs Akbar Ali Unnian Haji regarding balance court fee payment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thomas A.P filed a suit against Akbar Ali Unnian Haji regarding the payment of balance court fees. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of court fees as per the counsel's statement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint for non-payment of balance court fee, as the plaintiff did not provide instructions to remit it.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thomas A.P (46 years) Anamthuruthil house, Chilavannor, Kadavanthra P.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 020

Defendants

Akbar Ali Unnian Haji (Age not specified years) 113, Ismail Building, Temkar Steet, near J.J. Hospital Signal, Mumbai, Pin – 400008 Akbar Ali Unnian Haji (Age not specified years) Chammani towers, Kaloor junction, Banerji road, Kaloor P.O, Pin – 682 017, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases