Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Rent Control Petition No. 5 of 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs T. Ahammed Kutty et al regarding Rent Control

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V., B.A, LL.B., Rent Controller
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
Approximately 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners sought relief under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act but later decided not to press the petition, resulting in its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitioners decided not to press the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not decided
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners decided not to press the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for petitioner submitted that petition is not pressed and endorsed the same to that effect.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thitheemu
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima Rooby
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Anwar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T. Ahammed Kutty (Died), Ahammedkutty Brothers
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o Ahammedkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aminu
Party Age
47
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ummu Athikka
Party Age
38
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mumthaz
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ummu Hani
Party Age
34
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamsudheen
Party Age
32
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ismail
Party Age
30
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief sought under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Evidence:
Petition filed under Section 11(3), 11(4)(v) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs T. Ahammed Kutty et al regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs T. Ahammed Kutty et al regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/08/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 12/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Sat, 12/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Power of Attorney Holder

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs K.P. Saidalavi regarding rent control petition
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won