Rent Control Petition No. 31 of 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs Sunitha regarding rent control petition

Court

Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-12-21

Duration

Not mentioned

Case Closed

Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rent control petition filed by Thitheemu and others under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings Act was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The petition filed by the plaintiffs under Kerala Buildings Act was dismissed as not pressed.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Petitioner's Counsel submitted that the petition is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thitheemu
Party Age: 60
Relation: Wife of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Rooby
Party Age: 32
Relation: Daughter of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Anwar
Party Age: 44
Relation: Son of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age: 46
Relation: Son of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sunitha
Party Age: 44
Relation: Wife of K.R. Mohan Das

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Lease and Rent Control Appeal

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Petition filed under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Evidence: