Rent Control Petition No. 6 of 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs Muhammed Kutty regarding lease dispute

Court

Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-12-21

Duration

Case Closed

Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed a petition seeking relief under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, which was dismissed as not pressed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Decided

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The petition filed by the plaintiffs under the Rent Control Act was dismissed by the court as not pressed.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Counsel for petitioner submitted that petition is not pressed and endorsed the same to that effect.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thitheemu
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Rooby
Party Age: 32
Relation: D/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Anwar
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammed Kutty
Party Age: 55

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Vipin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.Najmath
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Relief sought under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Evidence: