Case Summary
The petitioners filed a rent control petition against the respondent. However, the petition was dismissed as it was not pressed for hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed as not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed for hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
The petition is not pressed. He made endorsement to that effect.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thitheemu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Rooby
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Anwar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.K. Saidalavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Showing representation for petitioners 3 and 4
Defendants Documents
Not clear from judgment
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition filed under Section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Evidence:
Not clear from judgment
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing representation for petitioners 3 and 4
Reference:
Not clear from judgment
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K.K. Saidalavi regarding tenancy dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K.K. Saidalavi regarding tenancy dispute