Case Summary
Petitioners filed a Section 11(3) petition under Kerala Buildings Act requesting relief, but the counsel did not press the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the counsel for the petitioner did not press the petition.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thitheemu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Wife of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Rooby
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- Daughter of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Anwar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.K. Saidalavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K.K. Saidalavi regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K.K. Saidalavi regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act petition