RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 12 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs K. Mohandas regarding rental control petition

Court

Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2017-01-03

Duration

Not mentioned

Case Closed

Tue, 01/03/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners, including a wife, daughter, and sons of Late Kunhimuhammed, filed a petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, but later decided not to proceed. The court dismissed the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Dismissed

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition as the counsel for the petitioners decided not to press the petition.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thitheemu
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Rooby
Party Age: 32
Relation: D/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Anwar
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K. Mohandas

Plaintiffs Documents

Power of Attorney

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 dismissed as not pressed

Evidence:

The counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney

Submitted By: Unknown

Relevance:

Representative authority given for petitioners 3 and 4.

Reference:

Case Classification