Case Summary
Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 by multiple petitioners claiming relief, but later not pressed resulting in dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Unknown
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thitheemu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Wife of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Rooby
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- Daughter of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Anwar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- I.P. Kunhimuhammed
- Relation
- Son of Bavu
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Proof of Representation
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Lease and Rent Control Relief
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petitioner's counsel did not press the petition leading to its dismissal.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that the petition is not pressed. He made endorsement to that effect. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Representation of Petitioner 3 and 4 by Power of Attorney Holder
Reference:
Unknown
Document Type:
Proof of Representation
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidencing the representation of Petitioner 3 and 4 by Power of Attorney Holder
Reference:
Unknown
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs I.P. Kunhimuhammed regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs I.P. Kunhimuhammed regarding lease and rent control