Case Summary
Rent dispute case where petitioners sought relief under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 but later dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Rent Control Dispute
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel endorsed the same effect.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thitheemu
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Wife of Late Kunhimuhammed.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Rooby
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- Daughter of Late Kunhimuhammed.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Anwar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Son of Late Kunhimuhammed.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Khader (Died)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesa Umma
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Wife of Abdul Khader.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Party Age
- 43
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Noorjahan
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raseena
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abida
- Party Age
- 35
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sameera
- Party Age
- 33
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition filed under Section 11(3), 11(4)(v) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that petition is not pressed and endorsed the same to that effect. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Dispute
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Rental Dispute
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs Abdul Khader et al regarding rental dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs Abdul Khader et al regarding rental dispute